Thursday, December 5, 2013

Roy - Amsterdam - 02/06/2013 @ 4:21 pm Dirk Jan - Zutphen: Uh, so you think la carte in the U.S. ha


An a la carte television service that the consumer of the contents of channels may determine, in the Netherlands buffet breakfast surfers paradise itself seems far away. Content providers seem to be. Stumbling block
Technically it is possible and suppliers can also make it possible for clients. That represented Marnix Laurs main content partnership with KPN and the cable Councils Conference. Content Providers shall maintain an a la carte subscription however against. Especially in niche and human-interest channels, the revenue from the sale of TV subscriptions less. Be As a result, the monthly fee at an a la carte subscription for those channels higher. It is not inconceivable that TV stations forced by a lack of income to stop. KPN otherwise pay a transfer fee to all channels which you pass. KPN offers buffet breakfast surfers paradise in Belgium through its new TV product called Snow a limited possibility to subscribe to a TV channel.
A la carte subscription expensive an a la carte subscription with its own tuner is a wish of many consumers. However, the TV subscription seem more expensive than now to go. Incurred by the provider to the TV subscriptions in the subscription form It is also possible in the first stage of teething problems with billing expect a more complicated structure subscription.
ADSL user - Brunssum buffet breakfast surfers paradise - 04/06/2013 13:48 PM Subscribe buffet breakfast surfers paradise by channel could pose a problem buffet breakfast surfers paradise for some channels. All channels are often active in several countries, so one has then still income. Premium content, commercial stations by country or channels that are in fact paid by the citizens through taxation. Which channels buffet breakfast surfers paradise are you talking about? Because imagine that there are not much matter that you get extra money if you can pay. Per channel Only you have to see to komen.Tsja .. a distribution agreement
Erik - Hasselt - 02/06/2013 @ 12:50 pm Peter, one subscription per area of interest was at Ziggo, they have moved away from this structure because it would be complicated. You could, for example, a subscription package Knowledge, kids package, etc. each with x number of channels. I do not think the current form (standard, plus extra) handy. I have to take extra special for History package.
Digital - Digital - 02/06/2013 12:18 pm So you mean, ample channels, but on condition buffet breakfast surfers paradise that you always take at least 5 or 10? Law may also ALL providers offer the following current must carry + popular channels on top everyone to prefer compiling packages of 5 or 10 at least, imagine a packet of 50 or more together you get a bit of karting, more interesting for multi-person households. buffet breakfast surfers paradise
hans2 - west - 02/06/2013 10:23 pm think all "channel on demand" just not realistic is.wel if you can fill 5euro.daarna rising in numbers eg a package of 10 standard channels themselves. same money for additional supply of premiumkanalen.zo is both the provider assured income and the viewer's choice of zenders.zo remains affordable and in line with what is paid now become.
Roy - Amsterdam - 02/06/2013 @ 4:21 pm Dirk Jan - Zutphen: Uh, so you think la carte in the U.S. has already taken place or is coming up. Dream on. The only one that is in the U.S., in addition to the consumer, is John McCain. And his bill la carte still has no co-sponsors in the Senate. After 15 years http://www.deadline.com/2013/05/viacom-chief-scoffs-at-john-mccains-effort-to-bust-pay-tv-bundles/
ADSL user - Brunssum - 01/06/2013 @ 18:05 JoostA Wood. Right there you have the limitation of FTTH or FTTC parties. Dish has in this regard simply the best potential. What I do wonder what a cable company then well on so small a station to pay? Indeed, most look through this cable and the cable company seems therefore to have power. Whether I see this wrong? Because without that cable operator is true that small transmitter? You could almost say that some have to pay ha ha. Before the cable company That power can deploy.
JoostA - Wood - 01/06/2013 16:54 pm "KPN pays all other channels that can pass a transfer fee." Indeed, like all media that serve as independent form of disclosure you pay a provider copyright. This means that (glass) fiber impossible "everything" can pass: the copyrights would make it priceless. Hence, a dish such a "profit" yields: which channels pluck you out of the air.
Roy - Amsterdam - 01/06/2013 16:39 PM la carte is incidentally a bad idea for new channels. Because how are you going to the viewer without ever having aired convince them to subscribe. Located at your new station 1 minute And if that fails, then this should be a minimum number to weigh the cost. Against the benefits to This will never work, except for the large station groups perhaps. And not at all

No comments:

Post a Comment